(Warning: This post is about my personal health and only very tangentially related to Buddhism. If you’re a diabetic or pre-diabetic (and who isn’t these days?) it might be of interest; otherwise it might not. I feel the need to share this story with other diabetics who are struggling the way I used to struggle, and since this is my blog, I guess I can post whatever I want. )
How does change occur? What allows or permits a fundamental shift in perception, awareness, and sensibility? How does an unresolved problem and source of perennial dissatisfaction finally click into clarity and a solution emerge along with the will, intention, and desire to implement it? As a psychologist this is an open question I’ve lived with all my professional life. What enables people to change? Prochaska’s oft-cited model of Stages of Change (Precontemplation, Contemplation, Preparation, Action, Maintenance), while helpful, is heavily cognitive-behaviorally oriented. It needs to be supplemented with a phenomenological approach that stresses embodied shifts in awareness. ”Readiness to act” isn’t just a constellation of ideas or a set of behaviors; it’s an internal shift in bodily awareness, the way the body as a whole apprehends a problem. Change takes more than an intellectual understanding. It takes the right message at the right time. Your body/mind has to be ready, yearning for it when you didn’t even see it clearly. When the moment comes, the willingness to seize it whole-heartedly is already present.
When I was first diagnosed with adult-onset diabetes 10 years ago, I treated the diagnosis as an opportunity to go to war. I’m a problem solver, and here was a problem to be fixed, or if not fixed, managed. I read everything I could about the disease, got an excellent endocrinologist, spoke with a nutritionist, and followed the recommended diet to a ”T.” My hemoglobin A1C (think of it as a measure of the average amount of sugar in your blood over a three month period) dropped from over 10 to just a tad under 6. My endocrinologist was pleased and so was I, except for the fact that I realized that I could not reach my target goals by following the standard American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommended diet. I needed to eat a lot less to stay within my goals.
Unfortunately, despite my best efforts, my weight kept creeping up and I gradually gained 25 pounds over the next ten years. (Thank you insulin! One of insulin’s main jobs is to convert carbohydrates into fat!), my A1Cs gradually rose to just under 7, and while my fasting blood sugars were not ”too” bad (100-110 mg/dl) my postprandial blood sugars were often well over the ADA recommended target of under 180 mg/dl. If I raised my insulin to get better coverage I experienced frightening hypoglycemic episodes, but if I didn’t raise my insulin my blood sugar went high after even modest meals. I found myself snacking between meals to prevent hypoglycemic episodes, especially on days when I went to the gym. With the type of insulin I was using, two daily injections of a mixture of fast and slow acting insulins, I found I could eat only two meals a day, otherwise my blood sugar numbers were hopeless. I was taking fifty units of insulin a day. I felt perpetually frustrated by my inability to control my illness, and yet resigned to the fact (like a good Buddhist!) that we are all impermanent, and all subject to illness, old age and death. My endocrinologist and I tried to come up with new ways of managing, trying this medication and that. Sometimes I’d give it a try; sometimes I’d be too nervous about using a medication that was new to the market and might have unknown long-term side effects. I stopped measuring my postprandial blood sugars for the most part. What was the point? They were almost always too high, and who wants to be continually reminded of unpleasant news when there/s nothing one can do to prevent it? My fasting blood glucoses were acceptable, and I had to find a way to content myself with that.
Then, about five months ago I came across Jenny Ruhl’s website and blog in which she outlined a different way of managing diabetes. It meant adopting a radical diet which seemed in some ways counterintuitive and at odds with what I already ”knew” (save us from what we think we already ”know”!), taking different forms of insulin and taking them more often, and calculating the number of grams of protein and carbohydrates I ate at each meal and then adjusting the amount of insulin I took down to the half-unit. She wrote clearly and persuasively, but I wasn’t sure how ”fringy” her advice was — the dietary advice was at odds with much that I had read — or how up I was to the regimen she described. It meant a total commitment to a complicated system. Jenny’s blog recommended a book by Dr. Richard Bernstein who was the first to develop these ideas — a hefty 500 page tome. I thought about it and thought about it (Prochaska’s Contemplation Stage), and after a month or so I bought the book and read it, then reread it, then reread it again trying to absorb the enormous amount of information it contained. Then, after more contemplation, I let it sit and percolate. I discussed the idea of changing over my insulin regimen with my endocrinologist (Prochaska’s Preparation Stage), and told her I wanted to think more about it and make a final decision at my next appointment three months from then.
At some point — after having my blood drawn by another doctor for another purpose — a blood draw that I didn’t know would include a blood glucose measure, so I didn’t fast before taking it — I had a postprandial blood glucose of 230 mg/dl. I remembered Jenny Ruhl’s assertion that Hemoglobin A1Cs in the ADA’s recommended ”under 7″ range were no protection against the ravages of diabetes — that it was postprandial highs that caused much of the damage — and I decided I was ready for radical change (Prochaska’s Action Stage) — nervous about it, but ready— just ”getting by” (which wasn’t really ”getting by” — it was just setting the stage for future decline) was no longer good enough.
My endocrinologist wasn’t familiar with Dr. Bernstein’s approach which involves a very low carbohydrate ketogenic diet (VLCKD) — keeping carbohydrates to 30 grams a day and using significantly smaller doses of insulin — but she trusted me and was willing to allow me to go along with it. She wrote prescriptions for a basal-bolus insulin regimen which I started three weeks ago. It’s absorbed all my energy and attention, but it’s also been a complete revelation. My fasting blood sugars now run routinely between 80-90, and often stay below 100 after meals. (If I’ve calculated my insulin correctly, sometimes my postprandial blood sugars are no different from my fasting blood sugars!) I’m not hungry, have no desire to snack between meals, and am enjoying the taste of food more. I’ve lost 10 pounds, mostly around my waist, and my insulin use has decreased by 60%. I feel healthier and more vital, as if the ”qi” in my body is flowing better. (There’s no such thing as ”qi,” is there? My logical ”scientist brain” tells me it’s a metaphor for something else — but then, what is that ”something else”?) I expect that when I go for my three month check-up with my endocrinologist my A1C will be below 6, my triglycerides will be substantially down, and my HDL will be higher.
The most intriguing change is that foods that used to be objects of desire have lost their allure. Good-bye to bread, cereal, grains, beans, pasta, rice, potatoes, fruit, and deserts! When I look at them my first reaction is ”this is poison for my body,” so sticking with the diet has not been a problem. It reminds me of the time 38 years ago when I finally quit smoking. I had an acute case of bronchitis but I was still smoking my usual two packs a day. At some point I noticed the physical sensation of the smoke filling my lungs — a moment of mindfulness. Something inside ”clicked,” and I came to the bodily realization that ”this is poison.” Not an ”idea,” but an embodied certainty. Something that had been a mere intellectual understanding before was now an embodied sense — and the desire to smoke evaporated into thin air. The idea of smoking was now disgusting to me. I threw my cigarettes out. I don’t remember having cravings afterwards. I was done.
I’m grateful to Jenny Ruhl and Dr. Richard Bernstein (who really deserves the Nobel Prize in Medicine for his amazing work!) for providing me with information about a new approach/regimen (actually not so new — Dr. Bernstein’s book came out in 1997) that has given me my life back, but I’m also left in wonder at the miracle of change. How did it occur? If I’d read Bernstein’s book 10 years ago, I would have dismissed it. One doctor I talked with recently told me ”You know, his work is very controversial.” I would have agreed. All the advice I read in standard diabetes books and magazines goes against it. It’s far too radical. It takes too much effort and commitment. Only a rabid true believer can follow it.
And yet, here I am, a rabid true believer.
We’re bombarded by media messages that tell us that we don’t have to give up anything to put our lives in order. We’re told: ”You can still eat the foods you love!” We live in a society that doesn’t believe in renunciation. We can have it all. Except that we can’t. The bad news is that we can’t eat the foods ”we love,” but the good news is that with my bodily shift in awareness, the whole intricate way in which my body now holds its understanding of my illness and wellness, the foods that I love have changed. I’ve renounced my old diet, but there’s no feeling of deprivation or loss. How else is one to feel when one has given up ”taking poison?”
Not to make too much of it, but as I write this I’m struck by how much this is also a form of Zen practice: embodied awareness, doing what’s needed whole-heartedly with undivided attention and effort, again and again, moment by moment, forever.
That’s the story I feel the need to share.
May all beings be well and healthy!
Why do we feel the need to explain ourselves when posting our personal stories? I do the same thing sometimes, and yet, that is what blogs are for, to provide a vehicle for our own stories. I’m not a diabetic or pre-diabetic (at least, I hope not — with my troubles, it’d be a real killer), but I could relate to the story of your struggle with this chronic disease. I thank you for sharing it, and congratulations on your success. I can also relate to how you must be feeling physically and mentally.
We Westerners tend to look at qi as a metaphor, but for Easterners, the Chinese in particular, it’s very real and the basis upon which many healing treatments are based. For them, qi is the energy of the universe channeled through nature and then through all living beings. It’s a bit like dao. It may be just life itself; after all, we must be animated by something more than mere electricity. Even viewed as just a metaphor or as something to use for visualization, it can be a powerful tool, and we can use as many tools in our arsenal that we can get.
Since I will be dealing with my own medical stuff over the next few days, and may not have the opportunity later, I want to send my best birthday regards to you.
David, I’ve reserved my blog solely for Buddhist essays up until now. This is the first one that isn’t essentially Buddhist, but the story felt important enough to share. I wanted to help my diabetic readers discover Dr. Bernstein’s book which ought to be much better known than it is. His method works so well, and is so immediately and demonstrably effective, that I’m amazed that it isn’t “received knowledge” at this date in time 17 years after its publication. Diabetes is completely controllable. Period. It doesn’t have to lead to cardiovascular disease, blindness, kidney disease, peripheral neuropathy, and amputation. Ever. The fact that we still allow this to occur through ignorance is totally shocking. The fact that a reasonably intelligent diabetic like myself can’t find this information out easily is an unexcusable tragedy. That fact that the ADA and the “experts” are still spouting harmful diet nonsense infuriates me. I can’t begin to tell you how profoundly disturbing this is!
I believe that “qi” does have some meaning, David. I studied tai chi for seven years, and currently attend a weekly qi gong class. I can feel the “energy” difference in my body even if I can’t find Western scientific ideas that can help account for that felt difference. But I am too much of a Western scientist to believe in forms of energy other than electromagnetism, gravity, the strong and weak force and “dark energy” that somehow affect our physical well-being but up until now have proved completely unmeasurable and unobservable. I wish I knew what the objective physical events that correspond to the bodily-felt experience of blockages and flow of “qi” are, but I’m content right now to leave it as something I just wonder about from time to time. Thanks for the birthday wishes and good luck with your own medical “stuff!”
I think this IS a truly Buddhist post, Seth. So often, I’ve turned away from the sources of my suffering and found myself thrashing around trying to figure out how it all got to this level of mess.
I’m glad you’ve found a way to meet the diabetes and all it involves. And you’re very right in saying there is something that has to happen beyond the cognitive for action to be useful and beneficial.
Thanks, Lynette!
Your post was about overcoming suffering, which sounds very Buddhist to me. And as for qi, I don’t buy it 100% either but I guess it must be like Hamlet’s remark to Horatio about heaven and earth and philosophy. ‘Nuff said from me.
Although I come here for Buddhist wisdom, I enjoyed this post as well. I’m glad your qi is flowing better. Please do me a favor and post a followup with your ‘before and after’ A1c’s on your new regimen. I’m so curious!
Deric, I’ll add a postscript in the comments section with my new A1c at the end of April. Thanks for the good wishes!
Deric, I’ve just had my three month follow-up. My HgA1c has fallen to 5.5 mg/dl and my triglycerides have decreased by 90 mg/dl.
Thank you for your post 🙂 Ironically, I found it while googling Bodhisattva vows, as I’m getting ready to take mine next month. When I went to your page, I saw your most recent post about diabetes, and your recommendation for Dr. Bernstein’s book. I will check it out. I do not have diabetes, my our 5 year old son does. He was diagnosed (with type 1 obviously) at age 2. His endo. is happy with his progress, but I need to see his A1C drop more. It’s still around 8, though his goals for daily glucose readings and A1C are higher than an adult because he is limited in his ability to determine symptoms of low blood sugar. Anyhow, at his last appointment his A1C was still 9 (down from 17 when he was diagnosed) which to me seems too high despite the endo’s happiness with it. That puts him at an average glucose of 220 when he should be around 180 for his age. We cannot put him, at this age, on a ketogenic diet but I have long thought it made more sense to lower the carbs and make sure the types of carbs eaten are nutritionally superior. His nutritionist insists he sticks to the ratio that they gave us, and also insist at his age it doesn’t even matter where the carbs come from as long as he is eating. I find this to be a very dumbed down approach and I’m not terribly happy with it.
Thank you for sharing your story and information, what a pleasant surprise to find it while I was searching for Buddhist information as well!
Kim,
Many blessings on the occasion of taking your Bodhisattva vows! My heart goes out to you on your struggle to understand what’s the best treatment for your son. I confess I have no idea what is the best treatment for a five year old, although I strongly share your suspicion that an HbA1c of 8 is not good enough to prevent complications down the road. May I also recommend two other sources of information — Jenny Ruhl’s book “Blood Sugar 101,” and the “Diabetics for “Dr. Bernstein’s Diabetes Solution” Facebook page. Best of luck to you on both your Buddhist journey, and the journey of parenthood.
Hi, that is a great post and a story of success in managing Diabetes, I also doing the same thing after Dr. B saved me along with others like Jenny Ruhl and Dr. Rob Thompson the author of the low glycaemic load diabetes solution.
Thanks for sharing that with us, All the best
Ahmed – thanks for visiting the site and adding your comment. I am appreciative of all the work you do to get out the word about low carb, high fat ketogenic diets in the arabic speaking community (http://afifi30.blogspot.com/)! Keep it up!
I wanted to thank you for your posts at Existential Buddhism. I’m sharing them with my daughter, who happens to have a psychology degree and now she is in grad school for Clinical Nursing. I’m sharing them with her as part as an introduction to Buddhism. You are perfect.
Thanks, Tracy! It’s about time someone recognized my perfection! 🙂 I’m going to share that assessment with my wife!
So what exactly is the metaphysics of change? Maybe a follow-up post, please.
One day it just hits you — or, rather, one has already just changed, and it seems like a hit ’cause one hasn’t noticed until then — and you’re something else, different than before. Rather effortlessly, in many ways. What’s the how of all this??
Perhaps there is no “real” answer — maybe it’s like the weather; for all the science involved, no prediction is possible (and thus no control, no free will).